Tape No. I-4146Page
We will look at just a few scriptures to lay a foundation for what I am going to say. Romans 3:20â21 Paul says:
âTherefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.â (KJV)
No one will ever achieve righteousness with God by keeping a law.
âBut now the righteousness of God apart from law is revealed, being witnesses by the law and the prophets.â
The righteousness of God which the New Testament reveals is apart from law. And then Romans 6:14:
âFor sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.â (KJV)
I pointed out there are two mutually exclusive alternatives. You are either under law or under grace; you cannot be under both at the same time. If you are under grace, sin will not have dominion over you. If you are under law, sin will have dominion over you. And then Romans 10:4:
âFor Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.â (KJV)
Christ by his death on the cross finally and forever put an end to keeping the law as a means of achieving righteousness with God. It is ruled out from henceforth and forever that every one who believes, whether itâs Jew or Gentile, Catholic or Protestant, makes no difference.
Now the problem with the church historically is that we tend to be like a drunkard staggering down a road, we lurch to one side and fall into the ditch, get up out of the ditch and lurch across to the other side and fall into the opposite ditch. This is true in many areas. So many of us come into truth by reaction against error, and usually we overreact. So we go to the opposite extreme. For instance, some people believe in predestination, others believe in manâs free will. Some people are in one ditch, some are in the other. The truth of the matter is the truth is in the middle of the road. Some people believe in prosperity and some people believe in suffering for the gospel. And again, we have two opposites. The truth is in the middle of the road. Itâs neither in one ditch nor the other.
And the same can apply to this. We can say, well, we renounce law as a means of achieving righteousness with God so weâre free to do whatever we like. Historically that alternative has been called Antinomianism which means being opposed to law. That is not Godâs alternative. God has a way down the middle of the road which is neither legalism nor antinomianism. We are not free, because we have been set free from the law, to do anything we please or to practice lawlessness.
I want to give you two scriptures on lawlessness. 1John 3:4:
âWhoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness.â
Obviously God is not directing us to lawlessness. If you have the Old King James Version it says whoever commits sin transgresses the law. Thatâs an unfortunate translation. The correct translation which you find in this New King James and in all the modern versions is âwhoever commits sin commits lawlessness, for sin is lawlessness.â Thatâs the very essential nature of sin; is lawlessness. I want you to know this morning I am not recommending or endorsing lawlessness. Letâs not fall into that ditch.
I have to say however, that for every one person who is deceived by lawlessness or antinomianism, there are probably a million who are deceived by legalism. Legalism deceives the honest, the sincere, the dedicated. Lawlessness only attracts people who arenât serious anyhow. So statistically, far a greater danger is legalism rather than lawlessness. And I would say, from my limited knowledge of church history, almost every major revival in the history of the church has foundered on the rock of legalism. And legalism has effectually quenched the work that God started.
Also let me read to you Matthew 7:21â23:
âNot every one that says to me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he who does the will of my Father in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in your name? And cast out demons in your name? And done many wonders in your name? And then I will declare to them, I never knew you, depart from me you who practice lawlessness.â
Thatâs a remarkable scripture. Personally, my belief is that those people who will stand before Jesus and say we have done miracles in your name and cast out demons in your name will be speaking the truth. Thatâs my personal impression. But they will have done it with the wrong attitude of heart. They will have never submitted themselves to God, they will never have embraced the cross and renounced their self-will. At least one thing is clear: no one who practices lawlessness will be accepted by Jesus.
Then the question arises, and this is my theme this morning, what should be the place of law in our lives? It has a place; an important place. We do not set it aside, we have to give it the right place.
Now hereâs where you are going to need your minds. Iâve meditated on this theme for forty years or more. Iâm the only contemporary preacher I knowâand there may be many I donât knowâwho has ever really been occupied with this theme. Iâve never heard any other preacher deal with it. To me, the failure to deal with this issue is the source of countless problems in the contemporary church. I suppose I was led to it because of my philosophic background because I immediately saw hereâs an issue thatâs got to be settled. And itâs taken me forty years to come to the understanding that Iâm going to try to share with you this morning.
All right. What should be the place of law in our lives? Hereâs my basic answer. Grace received through being made righteous by faith will enable us to keep those laws which are appropriate for us. But weâre not made righteous by keeping them. We have to be made righteous by faith first in order to be able to keep them. But keeping them never makes us righteous. Did you get that? Have I communicated that?
Now, what are the laws that are appropriate for us? Iâm going to deal with three areas quickly. First of all, the laws of secular government. And unless these are directly contrary to God, we are obligated to keep them. And letâs add that includes the speed limit! And I personally admit I have a continual struggle with that one. Donât drive behind me, I donât want you to see me! However, the principle is there. 1 Peter 2:13â14:
âTherefore submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lordâs sake: whether to the king of supreme, or to governors, or to them who are sent by him for the punishment of evildoers, for the praise of them that are good.â
There are many other such scriptures in Titus, in Romans. We are obligated as Christians to observe all secular law unless itâs directly contrary to the requirements of God. Where Godâs requirements and secular law go against one another, then Godâs requirements are the higher.
I have a friend who was a doctor in Denmark working for the State Social Medical Service, a Christian, and in that position he was obligated to perform abortions for ladies who wanted them. And he felt that was contrary to the law of God and he gave up his job as a doctor. Thereâs a simple example of where thereâs a conflict. But most of the time, at least in the United States, there isnât a conflict. Now if youâre living in an Islamic or a Communist country, Christians there are often faced with the choice of obeying the law of the government or the law of God. Wherever there is that clear cut issue, we have to do what Peter said, we are to obey God rather than men. However, that is a situation which doesnât concern most of us in the United States as Christians most of the time. Thank God for the United States.
Second, thereâs the law of any social group to which we are committed. And all of us have to be committed to some social group. Family, church, place of work, et cetera. Now if you are in a social group, part of being a part of that group is to observe its rules. Youâre obligated to do so. If youâre a member of a family, you keep the rules of the family. The times of meals, the time to go to bed, there are places to put your dirty clothes, all sorts of things. But youâre obligated to observe those rules. If youâre a member of a church, every church has to have some rules. The times of meetings, the way its business is conducted, so on. We donât need to go into detail. If youâre a member of a church, youâre obligated to observe the rules of that church. If you donât like the rules of the church, youâre probably in the wrong church. But donât be in a group and be a rebel, thatâs not legitimate.
All right. Now Iâm going to make an observation about rules in family and church. The rules, or the laws, should be simple, practical, in harmony with scripture and open to modification where necessary. Letâs not make laws of the Medes and Persians which never change. Letâs be flexible in these areas. Many churches have run into problems because they made laws in one generation which were not appropriate for the next generation. Like years back, in the Pentecostal movement in Denmark, ladies had to wear black stockings. Well, today for a lady to wear black stockings is rather avantgarde. I mean, things have changed. Do you understand? So some rules should be open to modification.
Now Iâm not really concerned this morning with those two areas, I just want to point them out because they are relevant to all of us. The area of secular government and the area of social groups of which we are a part.
I want to come to the third area which is the one that really concerns us; the area of Godâs word. Being obedient to the word of God. What are we expected to observe? The Bible is full of rules and commandments and regulations. What are we expected to do? What are we required to do? And youâll find all sorts of people pick out the strangest rules from the strangest places and suddenly apply them. Like if a man has divorced a wife itâs wrong for him to take her back. Well that was a rule made in a specific social context for a specific group of people. I think itâs ridiculous to apply that to contemporary Christians in America. There are all sorts of rules about what women ought or ought not to wear. Some of which are very valid today and others of which donât apply. Preachers tend to pick out the rules that suit them and emphasize them. And if theyâre male preachers, the rules are usually directed against the females. I donât think thatâs the legitimate way to interpret the Bible.
I want to give you what I believe is the answer. Like I said last week, if you paid me a million dollars it wouldnât be enough. But I didnât pay anything for it so Iâm not charging anything for it. Romans 8:3â4. I mean sincerely, we were talking about the place of the word of God, I believe what Iâm sharing with you frankly are treasures of uncountable value.
âFor what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, [thatâs through our carnal nature] God did sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin, he condemned sin in the flesh.â
Paul always points out there was never anything wrong with the law of Moses. The problem was us, not the law. We are incapable of keeping the law. Instead of bringing out good it brings out the rebel in us. Now, this is the key verse:
âThat the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.â
So God has set aside the law but he wants us to fulfill the righteous requirement of the law. Thatâs the key.
Now we have to understand what is the righteous requirement of the law. This is absolutely the key issue. Let me say that that word occurs a number of different times, the word thatâs translated righteous requirement is one single word in Greek. Interestingly, in Revelation l9:8, you donât need to turn there, it describes the bride of Christ and says she was attired in fine linen, clean and bright. And it says the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Itâs the same word. So you understand, when we come to the end of our earthly journey and appear before God, we will be attired in the righteous acts or the righteous requirement which God expects of us.
But here in Romans 8:4 itâs singular, the righteous requirement of the law. What is that? I believe itâs possible to answer it in one word. One short word of four letters. How many of you can guess? Love, thatâs right. Now this is crucial. I am saying my conviction is the answer to that is that the righteous requirement of the law is love. Iâll give you a number of scriptures. Matthew 22:35â40:
âThen one of them, a lawyer, [but that would mean a teacher of the law, not an attorney] asked Jesus a question, testing him and say, Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law? [Thatâs a specific question and Jesus immediately gave a specific answer:] Jesus said to him, You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. [Notice that.] This is the first and great commandment. The second is like to it. You shall love your neighbor as yourself.â
So those are the two great commandments of the law, each of them is love. The first is love for God, the second is love for your neighbor. And then Jesus continues:
âOn these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.â
In other words, as I understand it, everything in the law and the prophets had one sole purpose: to produce love for God and love for our neighbors. This has not changed. Itâs precisely the same in the New Testament. The objective is the same, the means of achieving it are different. Some Christians teach though, that somewhere in the middle of history, God has a sudden change of mind. Heâs been demanding one thing of people under the Old Covenant, now he demands something completely new under the New Covenant. Thatâs not the least bit true. Always the one thing he will ask for first and foremost is love. Love for God and love for your neighbors. All thatâs changed is the means by which we can obey that commandment. Thatâs the difference. John said we donât write to you any new commandment. He said we write to you an old commandment, the one that you had from the beginning. But itâs new because now it works whereas before it didnât.
Then letâs turn to 1Timothy 1:5â7:
âNow the purpose of the commandment [the NASB says, and this is excellent, the goal of our instruction is, What?] love.â
The thing we are aiming at in all our Christian ministry, in all our church activity is what? Love. When you see that, a lot of other things begin to fall into place. And then he says:
âFrom which some having strayed have turned aside to idle talk.â
In other words, anything that doesnât produce love is just empty wasted words. How many empty wasted words do we have in our churches today? How many churches ever produce love? How many ministers today have even got a vision of the goal? The goal of our instruction is love. I examine my own ministry that way. I say to myself, Am I producing people who are loving? If Iâm not, Iâm wasting my time. And Godâs time too. How much wasted time is there in the churches of America today? Thatâs up to you to answer.
Romans 13:8â10:
âOwe no one anything...â
Now thatâs not what Iâm going to preach on but let me stop there for a moment. That is a commandment too. Donât be in debt. Did you hear me? Donât be in debt. A lot of you are going to have to change your lifestyle to keep that commandment. But it is a commandment.
âOwe no one anything, except to love one another: for he who loves another has fulfilled the law. For the commandments you shall not commit adultery, you shall not commit murder, you shall not steal, you shall not bear false witness, you shall not covet; and if there is any other commandment, are all summed up in this saying, namely, you shall love your neighbor as yourself. Love does no harm to a neighbor: therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.â
I think that answers exactly Romans 8:4, the righteous requirement of the law.
Then we could look also in Galatians 5:13â14:
âFor you brethren have been called to liberty; only do not use liberty as an opportunity for the flesh, [the carnal nature], but through love serve one another.â
In other words, donât stagger out of the ditch of legalism into the ditch of antinomianism and use your liberty as an occasion to indulge your fleshly nature. Thatâs not legitimate. Whatâs the alternative? Through love serve one another. Let me give you this advice. When in doubt, serve. Itâs safe. You donât know what to do? Serve.
âFor all the law is fulfilled on one word [or one statement], even in this; you shall love your neighbor as yourself.â
I think the New Testament leaves absolutely no doubt as to what the righteous requirement of the law is.
Then letâs look in Galatians 5:6 for a moment since weâre in that chapter. Hereâs another of those statements that would change almost every church in the nation if people would believe it.
âFor in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision availeth anything, [and another translation says means anything] but faith working through love.â
In the last resort thereâs only one thing that matters. What is that? Faith working through love. Now we canât leave out the faith. Iâll tell you why. Itâs all well to say love is the only thing that matters, but faith is the only way to get that love. If you donât have faith you wonât have the love. Thereâs no other way that love can come to our hearts and lives but through faith. So itâs faith working by love.
Now I want to point out that Paul there indicates the only kind of faith acceptable to God is faith that works through love. Itâs not theological faith, itâs not doctrinal faith. People can have all sorts of theological and doctrinal faith which leaves them angry, bitter, contemptuous, unloving and unlovable. That has nothing to do with the faith of the New Testament. This faith comes only by a supernatural operation of the Holy Spirit. You cannot have this kind of life living on the plain of your natural ability, it is impossible. Youâre incapable of it.
Letâs look in Romans 5:5. We wonât read the first part of the verse but only the second part.
âThe love of God has been poured out in our hearts by the Holy Spirit who is given to us.â
Notice, not some love that we can work out or achieve by our own efforts, but the love of God has been poured into our hearts by the Holy Spirit. But we can only receive it through faith. The moment we get off the basis of faith and back into our own works, the fountain is shut off and weâre back with the best we can do in our own carnal nature, and that is not good enough. Because what are the works of the flesh? Theyâre anything but love. Theyâre every kind of division, hatred and strife. I was in a conversation about lawyers recently in America. Somebody commented that one lawyer said thereâs one type of case I stay out of, thatâs church fights. He said theyâre the worst. And I said, I agree. Absolutely. They are the worst. Godâs people, when they are no longer living in the realm of faith and the supernatural, are the most cantankerous, unpleasant, unlovable people on the face of the earth. Theyâre just like the Pharisees. In fact, they are the lineal spiritual descendants of the Pharisees.
Now, love supplies a double motivation. We need to be very concerned with what are our motives because theyâre really going to determine whether we do things right or not. If you outwardly conform with the wrong motives, your conformity wonât last. It wonât work. Youâll be like a child putting on her motherâs shoes. It just wonât stay on her feet very long. But love supplies a double motivation. First of all, for obedience to the Lord. And secondly, for right conduct toward men. And itâs the only motivation that works. Letâs look at the question of obedience to the Lord first in John 14:15. Jesus says to his disciples:
âIf you love me, keep my commandments.â
Whatâs the reason for keeping my commandment? That you love me. And then he goes on to say and he puts two opposite cases side by side in verses 23â24:
âIf anyone loves me, he will keep my words. My Father will love him, we will come to him and make our home with him.â
If anybody loves me, what will he do? He will keep my word. If you have difficulty in keeping Godâs word, the problem is you donât love him enough. Donât go into agonies of self analysis. Ask the Lord to help you to love him more. Then he goes on to say:
âHe who does not love me, does not keep my word.â
Thatâs as simple as can be. The one who loves me will keep my word. The one who does not love me will not keep my word. Whatâs the motivation for obeying the Lord? Love, not fear of punishment. Turn to 1John 4:18. John discusses this question. Again, youâre going to need the modern translations to get the clear meaning.
âThere is no fear in love; but perfect love casts out fear; because fear involves torment.â
Thatâs what this translations says, the New King James. But youâll find all the other translations will say fear has to do with punishment. All right? Weâre motivated by fear of punishment. If I donât do the right thing, Godâs going to judge me, heâs going to punish me. But John says he who fears, he who is motivated by fears has not been made perfect in love. That excites me because it shows me there is a possibility to be made perfect in love, and one of the ways I can measure my progress is determining my motivation. Why am I doing what Iâm doing? Am I doing it because Iâm afraid of being punished? Or am I doing it because I love the Lord? The Lord is very wise. He knows what the strongest motivation is. Itâs love.
Many of us here are parents. Which kind of child would we rather have to deal with? The one to whom we have to say all the time, if you donât do what I tell you, Iâm going to punish you? We all know you can threaten and threaten and threaten. But sooner or later whatâs in that child will come out. What about the other kind of child? I know you love me, this is what I want you to do. Youâll do it because you love me. See, God knows what works.
The only motivation that actually works for any length of time is love. That is our motivation for obeying the Lord. Many of us frankly have never really entered into that because weâve grown up in church traditions where it was all a series of threats. If you donât do this, something will happen to you. I never was in the Catholic Church but Iâve talked to many Catholics who say they were continually in a Catholic school threatened with the fear of hell. My observation was it didnât keep them from doing wrong things. It doesnât. Thatâs no attack on Catholics because the same type of motivation is found in different language in most churches. Most fundamentalist groups, thatâs their motivation. God would accept it if it worked. The problem is it doesnât work. Thatâs hard for the religious mind to concede, see? Making rules doesnât make people righteous.
I was engaged in educational work in Kenya, East Africa. I was going around with one of the education officers of the government with whom I had to work. She was a good lady, probably a nominal Christian. She certainly wasnât a burning Spirit filled Christian. We were talking about a certain Pentecostal girlâs school which was just full of rules. I mean, they couldnât run around without having a rule to tell them what to do. And this lady said to me, Rules donât make people good. It was so simple. Iâve never forgotten it. Rules donât make people good. They may stop people from doing the wrong thing for a time, but they do not make people good. If you could grasp that and walk out of here this morning with the real clear realization, rules donât make people good. They donât change the inner nature.
I think itâs good to lobby for laws that stop people doing bad things. I think we should do that. But the best way to stop people from doing bad things is to turn bad people into good people. Thatâs what revival does. In a little island in the Hebrides called Louis, in l948, there was an island wide revival. And I happened to have met the man whom God used. I also had a lady in my church who had a sister in that island. So I heard first hand what was going on. And Iâll just relate it to you for a moment. This is a little interlude. There were two elderly ladies in this church in Louis who were praying for revival. One of them was blind. They prayed for years and God told them, âIâll send a revival.â The man Iâll use is Duncan Campbell from Glasgow.
So they went to the minister of the church and they said, âGod has told us that heâs going to send a revival but he wants you to invite Duncan Campbell.â
Well the minister wasnât really convinced but just to keep them quiet he said, âIâll invite him but I know he wonât come.â Because Duncan Campbell was a well known minister and this was a very small place.
So the minister of the church wrote to Duncan Campbell, got an answer back, âIâm afraid I canât come for the dates you proposed, I have another commitment.â
So he showed the letter to the old ladies and said, âThere you are, heâs not coming.â
They said, âOh, yes, heâs coming.â
A little while later he wrote back and said, âMy other commitment has been canceled and I can come.â
And they said to the minister, âWe told you so!â
Well, by that time a few others had joined them in prayer, including a couple of deacons in church. So they had this first service in the church. Duncan Campbell was one of these people who preach about heaven and hell and being saved or lost and nothing much in between. And he preached that and nobody responded and the service ended, the people got up and began to walk out of the church. And the two ladies and the deacons dropped to their knees and said, âGod, youâre a covenant-keeping God, youâve made a covenant with us, weâre holding you to your covenant.â And in the streets of the city the people turned around, walked back, came back to the church and began to repent. And that started a revival that completely changed the whole of that island.
But what I want to say is this: There were a lot of people in the island who were heavy drinkers and used to go to the pub which we would call the saloon in America. And eventually the saloons all closed. You know why? Because everybody who used to be in the saloon was in the church. Whatâs the good of keeping a saloon open when nobody wants to go. Thatâs the best way to change human conduct. Itâs not to make laws, itâs to change the heart. Iâm not saying that we donât need laws. Laws restrain evil but they donât produce goodness.
All right. What about our motivation for people? Letâs go back to Romans 13:10. I didnât live in the United States in the days of prohibition, but I think thatâs a clear example that you can make good laws for bad people but it wonât change the people. And if peopleâs hearts are sufficiently set on doing evil theyâll break the laws. Romans 13:10, we read it once, weâll read it again.
âLove does not harm to a neighbor, therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.â
There you are. Love will not harm a neighbor. You donât need to make rules for people who have love because theyâll do the right thing anyhow. Iâm not against the rules, I want to tell you they donât produce the results.
And Paul said in Galatians 5 the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance. Against such there is no law. You donât need laws for people who are producing the fruits of the Spirit.
Now just a few more statements and weâll close. The next three statements are very important. Particularly the last one which changes everything. But weâll go through them in order. New Testament love is progressive. The New Testament contains many different requirements. It tells us a whole lot of things we must do and must not do. I checked through the epistle of James yesterday. In James alone there are something like fifty regulations what you must do and what you must not do. Itâs not that there are no requirements and no rules in the New Testament, the question is how do we come into them? And what Iâm saying is New Testament love is progressive. You donât do it all right the first time. How many of you would agree to that? Philippians 1:9â11. Paul says to the Philippians:
âI pray that your love may abound still more and more in knowledge and all discernment; that you may approve the things that are excellent, that you may be sincere and without offense till the day of Christ; being filled with the fruits of righteousness which are by Jesus Christ to the glory and praise of God.â
So Paul is saying itâs wonderful the love you have. But I pray that it will increase and that it will make you increasingly sensitive to the Lordâs requirements. Thatâs what love should do. I think itâs true even in a marriage. If a man and woman live together in love, the longer they live together the more sensitive theyâll be to each otherâs requirements. Theyâll know instinctively the things that hurt, the things that wound, and theyâll avoid them. But normally in a marriage it doesnât start that way. You donât need to put your hand up! We have to learn how love operates. Paul says the same. Itâs wonderful that you love but I pray that youâll become more and more sensitive as you go on to what pleases the Lord and what brings forth good fruit.
Take one area, an area that none of you have problems with, Iâm the only one here. The area of the tongue. Now when I was saved I was a confirmed blasphemer. And God instantly stopped that and there was no struggle, it just terminated. Well I thought, thatâs wonderful, now Iâve got it. Then God began to show me stage by stage all sorts of other areas; about being critical with my tongue and unkind, and then about making negative confessions and saying the wrong thing and giving utterances that were not utterances of faith. And then about making idle, empty remarks. Jesus said every idle word that men speak they shall give account thereof. Discovering what pleases the Lord with your tongue is progressive. You donât get it all in one go. And thatâs true of many, many other areas of the Christian life. So we go on.
Now under the law thatâs not so. Under the law when you come under it, youâve got to do it all right all the time or it doesnât do you any good. Thereâs no question of progress in the law. Letâs look in James 2 for a moment. Verses 10â11:
âFor whoever keep the whole law and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all.â
So itâs no good saying I keep 99.9 percent of the law. That wonât do. Itâs completely different. Youâve got to keep the whole law all the time. Thatâs the righteousness of the Lord which none of us can achieve. The alternative righteousness of faith is different, itâs progressive. Itâs step by step and stage by stage.
We can follow sometimes a system or a set of rules. Although, Iâve become more and more cautious about systems. I mean, I had systems for people to receive the Holy Spirit, I could tell you step by step. But I discovered people donât always receive by the system. I discovered the Holy Spirit will not submit himself to a system. If we make the system lord, the Holy Spirit just waits for us to change. We may have a system, but listen, this is subtle. We must never rely on the system but only on the Holy Spirit. If the Holy Spirit says, now thatâs a system to use in this situation, thatâs fine. But never bypass the Holy Spirit and rely on the system. How many of us would agree we made that mistake? Both hands for me! Iâm sorry Lord, really I am. I hope I wonât do it again. What an insult to the Holy Spirit really, to say I think I can do it by my system. You remember what I said the last time? As many as are regularly led by the Spirit of God, they and only they are sons of God.
Now hereâs the good news. At the end of all this, and this is so simple you may not understand how good it is. But all the time weâre progressing in love and stumbling and making mistakes and doing the wrong thingânow I know that doesnât apply to people here but there are some people like thatâall that time our faith is being counted to us for righteousness. Weâre never under condemnation. Did you get that? As long as we hold on to what? Our faith, thatâs right. This is such a truism amongst evangelicals that none of them believe it. Itâs the most amazing thing. They keep quoting it but they donât believe it. For me it was a discovery. I can make mistakes. I donât have to be perfect. But that doesnât lead me to condemnation. My faith is counted to me for righteousness all the time. Twenty-four hours of every day, seven days of every week, twelve months of every year, my faith is being reckoned to me as righteousness. Oh, how we can relax. Thank you Lord. Thank you. I donât have to sweat all the time. I donât have to make all these mental rules and say did I do this or did I do that? Letâs see the scriptures for it. Romans 4. You notice how often we go to Romans or Galatians? Theyâre the two main sources for this. Romans 4:4â5:
âNow to him that works the wages are not counted as grace, but as debt.â
You understand that? If you work eight hours a day, five days a week, forty hours and youâre paid at ten dollars an hour, you get 400 dollars. Thatâs not grace, thatâs wages. Youâve worked for it. Youâve earned it. If you can keep all the law all the time, youâve earned it. But nobody ever did keep all the law all the time. So thatâs ruled out.
Whatâs the alternative? Verse 5:
âBut to him who does not work...â
Thatâs an amazing statement. You know the first thing you have to do? Is stop doing anything. Stop trying because your trying wonât get it.
âBut to him who does not work, but believes in him who justified [or makes righteous, or reckons righteous] the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness.â
Thatâs quoted about Abraham. Itâs stated about Abraham in Genesis 15:16. After that Abraham did a number of things he ought not to have done. He allowed his wife to be taken into a Gentile harem and lied about her. And he went and had a son by his slave girl that he was not entitled to have. He made mistakes. But all the time, even when he made mistakes, his faith was being counted to him as righteousness. Oh, that is good news. Oh, thatâs wonderful. If you can just grasp it. That doesnât leave you any room for indifference or casualness but it lifts that awful burden of pressure, Iâve got to. Stop working and let God reckon your faith to you as righteousness.
Let me give you just one example from the history of the New Testament. Luke 22, at the last supper, Luke 22:31â34:
âAnd the Lord said, Simon, Simon, indeed Satan has asked for you that he may sift you as wheat.â
Now the you there is plural. Itâs you apostles. Itâs an amazing thought that Satan actually applied to God and said let me get those apostles. We donât understand some of the things that go on in the unseen realm, but Satan asked for permission to scatter the apostles. Then Jesus said to Peter:
âBut I have prayed for you...â
You, singular. Now if you have the Old King James youâll find itâs ye and thee. Thatâs the difference. Ye is plural, thou is singular. That doesnât come out in the modern translation.
âBut I have prayed for you [Peter, individually] that your faith should not fail... [letâs leave out the rest of it. Peter said to him,] Lord, I am ready to go with you, both to prison, and to death. Jesus said to him, I tell you, Peter, the rooster will not crow this day, before you will deny three times that you know me.â
Thatâs amazing. Peter, youâre going to deny me three times in this night but Iâve prayed for you. What? That you will not deny me? No. But what? That your faith will not fail. Peter, if you can keep on believing, no matter what happens, it will get you through. See? What a different picture. Remember, faith is the channel by which the Holy Spirit releases the love of God into our life. In Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but only faith that works by love.
Let me give you three applications of this, suggestions for how you should operate and then Iâll close. Number one, maintain and build up your faith. But check that it is biblical faith, a channel for Godâs love. Not doctrinal faith, theological faith, Baptist faith or Pentecostal faith, but biblical faith that makes you love people.
Number two, work out that love by serving. Youâre safe when you serve. Paul said, by love, do what? Serve one another.
Number three. Through prayer and Bible study become more and more sensitive to the way love applies in every situation.